Alabama Advisory Opinions April 01, 2011: AGO 2011-4 (2011-004)
Collection: Alabama Attorney General Opinions
Docket: AGO 2011-4
Date: April 1, 2011
Advisory Opinion Text
AGO 2011-4.
Cherokee County Judge of Probate
260 Cedar Bluff Road, Suite 101
Centre, Alabama 35960
Dear Judge Salter:
This opinion of the Attorney General is issued in response to your request.
Does section 28-2-23 of the Code of Alabama apply to dry counties that have wet municipalities?
Chapter 2 of title 28 concerns elections as to the sale and distribution of alcoholic beverages within counties. Article 1 of that chapter addresses an election to determine whether a county will be wet or dry. Article 2 of that chapter, which contains sections 28-2-20 through 28-2-25, addresses an election to determine whether a county will be wet under the unique rules of the Special Method Referendum Act.
Your question is specifically about section 28-2-23 of the Code, which is contained in article 2 of chapter 2. That statute begins as follows: "Any county or municipality which allows the sale of malt beverages under the provisions of this article shall be authorized to levy and collect a tax on the sale of such beverages... ." ALA. Code § 28-2-23 (2003) (emphasis added). Section 28-221 of that article provides that the question voted upon by the voters of a county, under that article, is as follows: '"Do you favor the legal sale and distribution of alcoholic beverages within the county under the Special Method Referendum Act of 1971? Yes____No____."' ala. code § 28-2-21 (2003) (emphasis added.) Thus, section 28-2-23 can only apply to a county that has gone wet under the Special Method Referendum Act. That section authorizes such wet counties, and the municipalities therein, to levy and collect a certain tax. Therefore, that section cannot apply to dry counties or to municipalities in dry counties.
Section 28-2-23 of the Code of Alabama does not apply to dry counties \ that have wet municipalities.
Because your other questions were based on the premise of an affirmative answer to the first question, it is not necessary to address those other questions.
I hope this opinion answers your question. If this Office can be of further assistance, please contact me.
Sincerely,
TROY KING
Attorney General
By:
BRENDA F. SMITH
Chief, Opinions Division
TK/RSH
1025429/145188