Skip to main content

California Cases December 07, 2022: Tyler v. Rash Curtis & Assocs.

Up to California Cases

Court: U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
Date: Dec. 7, 2022

Case Description

1

GARY J. TYLER, Plaintiff,
v.
RASH CURTIS & ASSOCIATES, et al., Defendants.

No. 2:22-CV-1137-KJM-DMC

United States District Court, E.D. California

December 7, 2022

ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this civil action. The parties appeared before the undersigned by telephone on November 2, 2022, at 10:00 a.m., for an initial scheduling conference. Upon consideration of the joint status report on file in this action, discussion with counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, the Court will, by this order, set a schedule pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Jurisdiction and venue are not contested.

2. Any amendments to the pleadings must be served and filed on or before December 15, 2022 .

2

3. The parties are advised that they may, if all consent, have the matter reassigned for all purposes, including entry of final judgment, to the undersigned Magistrate Judge. Given the extraordinary back-log of civil cases in this district, coupled with the shortage of District Judges and pandemic-related delays in criminal cases, it is not anticipated that this matter could be set for trial before the assigned District Judge at any time within the next two years. A trial before the District Judge within the next three years is also unlikely. The parties will be able to obtain an earlier trial date by consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Any jury trial by consent to the undersigned would be conducted in Sacramento, California. The parties are encouraged to meet and confer regarding the issue of consent and requested to notify the Court of the respective elections at their earliest opportunity.

4. The Court sets the following pre-trial schedule for this litigation:

Initial Disclosures : At the November 2, 2022, hearing, the parties were directed to exchange initial disclosures on or before November 30, 2022 . If any party has not served initial disclosures, such party shall do so forthwith and in no event later than December 12, 2022.

Non-Expert Discovery : All non-expert discovery shall be completed and all motions pertaining to non-expert discovery shall be noticed to be heard by December 12, 2023 .

Expert Witness Designations : The parties shall exchange initial lists of expert witnesses no later than January 12, 2024 . The parties shall exchange lists of rebuttal expert witnesses no later than January 26, 2024 . Such disclosures must be made pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(A) and (B). The parties are reminded of their obligation to supplement these disclosures when required under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(e).

Expert Discovery : All expert discovery shall be completed and all motions pertaining to expert discovery shall be noticed to be heard by February 29, 2024 .

Dispositive Motions : All dispositive motions shall be noticed to be heard by April 5, 2024 .

Duty to Supplement : The parties are reminded of their continuing obligation to supplement their initial disclosures, discovery responses, and expert witness designations when required under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(e).

3

5. A settlement conference is set before the undersigned on September 18, 2023, at 9:00 a.m.

6. The pre-trial conference and trial dates will be set by separate order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.