Kansas Cases March 15, 2021: United States v. McDonald

Case Description

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Derrick D. McDonald's Motion for Compassionate Release (Doc. 144). He seeks early release from prison due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The government opposes Defendant's motion. For the reasons stated in more detail below, the Court denies Defendant's motion.

On March 22, 2012, Defendant pleaded guilty to two counts of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). On July 2, 2012, Defendant was sentenced to 204 months' imprisonment. Defendant has filed multiple § 2255 motions, and the Court has denied them all.

Page 2

Defendant is 48 years old, and he is currently incarcerated at Lee USP. There have been 535 positive cases in the facility in which Defendant is housed, and no inmates have died. Currently, there are two active inmate cases, 14 active staff cases, and seven pending inmate tests. Defendant's projected release date is April 18, 2026.

On January 15, 2021, Defendant filed a motion seeking early release from prison due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Defendant did not set forth any medical conditions in his initial motion, but in his reply, he states that he has several underlying medical conditions. In addition, he states that he recently contracted COVID-19.

The First Step Act amended the compassionate release statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), to allow a defendant to file his own motion for release. It allows defendants to seek early release from prison provided certain conditions are met. First, "a criminal defendant may file a motion for compassionate release only if: '(1) he has exhausted all administrative rights to appeal the [Bureau of Prisons' ("BOP")] failure to bring a motion on his behalf, or (2) 30 days have passed since the warden of his facility received his request for the BOP to file a motion on his behalf.' " The administrative exhaustion requirement is jurisdictional and cannot be waived.

Page 3

Next, if a defendant satisfies the exhaustion requirement, the Court may reduce the defendant's sentence, after considering the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) to the extent they are applicable, if the Court determines: (1) "extraordinary and compelling reasons warrant such a reduction;" or (2) "the defendant is at least 70 years of age, has served at least 30 years in prison, pursuant to a sentence imposed under section 3559(c) . . . and a determination has been made by the Director of the [BOP] that the defendant is not a danger to the safety of any other person or the community." Finally, the Court must ensure that any reduction in the defendant's sentence under this statute is "consistent with applicable policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission."

Defendant seeks early release based on the spread of COVID-19 in prison. The government asserts that Defendant is not an appropriate candidate for early release.

A. Exhaustion

Defendant has satisfied the exhaustion requirement described in § 3582(c). He requested compassionate release from the Warden on December 11, 2020, and he was denied release on December 28, 2020. As of the date this motion was filed, more than 30 days have passed since Defendant's request. The government also concedes that Defendant meets the exhaustion

Page 4

requirement. Thus, because more than 30 days have passed since Defendant's request, the Court will proceed and determine the merits of Defendant's motion.

B. Extraordinary and Compelling Reasons

Defendant next asserts that his medical conditions of lung damage and a possible immune deficiency, coupled with the outbreak of COVID-19 in prison, constitute an extraordinary and compelling reason warranting a sentence reduction under § 3582(c)(1)(A). He also states that he recently contracted COVID-19 and should he contract one of the newer strains, he may be at an even greater risk of complications.

Although the Court is sympathetic to Defendant's concerns, Defendant's health conditions do not demonstrate a high risk. Furthermore, Defendant states that he was already diagnosed with COVID-19. It does not appear that he had medical complications from already having COVID-19, thus diminishing his concern that he will or would develop severe complications. The Court recognizes the concerns and risks of COVID-19, but the presence of it in his facility does not justify a compassionate release, particularly when Defendant already had COVID-19 without any evidence of severe health complications. Accordingly, Defendant does not meet his burden in demonstrating extraordinary and compelling circumstances warranting compassionate release.

C. Section 3553(a) Factors

The Court's conclusion is bolstered by a consideration of the applicable sentencing factors enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Some of these factors include the nature and circumstances

Page 5

of the offense; the need for the sentence imposed to reflect the seriousness of the offense, afford adequate deterrence, and protect the public from future crimes by the defendant; and the need to avoid unwarranted sentence disparities.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the serious offenses of bank robbery, occurring on June 27, 2011, and July 21, 2011. In the June 27 offense, Defendant carried a firearm. The sentencing guideline range was 188 to 235 months based on Defendant's career offender status, and the Court sentenced Defendant to 204 months.

The Court finds that the 204-month sentence originally imposed remains sufficient, but not greater than necessary, to meet the sentencing factors in § 3553(a) and punish the offense involved. Accordingly, the Court finds that Defendant does not demonstrate extraordinary and compelling reasons to warrant his early release from prison.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Compassionate Release (Doc. 144) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED .

Dated this 15th day of March, 2021.

/s/
ERIC F. MELGREN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE