Skip to main content

Michigan Cases June 11, 2021: Unlock Mich. v. Bd. of State Canvassers

Up to Michigan Cases

Court: Michigan Supreme Court
Date: June 11, 2021

Case Description

959 N.W.2d 730 (Mem)

UNLOCK MICHIGAN, George Fisher, and Nancy Hyde-Davis, Plaintiffs,
v.
BOARD OF STATE CANVASSERS, Secretary of State, and Director of the Bureau of Elections, Defendants.

SC: 162949

Supreme Court of Michigan.

June 11, 2021

Order

On order of the Court, the motion to intervene is GRANTED. The complaint for mandamus is considered, and mandamus is GRANTED. We direct the Board of State Canvassers (the Board) to certify the Unlock Michigan petition as sufficient. The Board's duty with respect to petitions is "limited to determining the sufficiency of a petition's form and content and whether there are sufficient signatures to warrant certification." Stand Up for Democracy v. Secretary of State , 492 Mich. 588, 618, 822 N.W.2d 159 (2012). In reviewing the petition signatures, the Board's role is circumscribed to "canvass[ing] the petitions to ascertain if the petitions have been signed by the requisite number of qualified and registered electors." MCL 168.476(1). In doing so, the Board may use "[t]he qualified voter file" and "the registration records by the clerk of any political subdivision" in order "to determine the validity of petition signatures by verifying the registration of signers and the genuineness of signatures on petitions when the qualified voter file contains digitized signatures." MCL 168.476(1). The Board's investigatory powers under MCL 168.476(2) relate only to the objects of investigation listed in MCL 168.476(1), i.e., whether "the petitions have been signed by the requisite number of qualified and registered electors." Consequently, "an investigation that goes beyond the four corners of the petition itself (i.e., the validity of the signatures or registration status of the electors) into the circumstances by which the signatures were obtained ... is clearly beyond the scope of the board's authority set forth under MCL 168.476(1)." Michigan Civil Rights Initiative v. Bd. of State Canvassers , 268 Mich. App. 506, 519-520, 708 N.W.2d 139 (2005).

In the present case, the Board approved the form and content of the petition in July 2020. The Bureau of Elections analyzed the signatures using a random sampling method and estimated that Unlock Michigan submitted at least 460,000 valid signatures when they only needed about 340,000. The Board rejected, by deadlocked vote, a motion to investigate the collection of signatures. The Board thus has a clear legal duty to certify the petition.