Skip to main content

Mississippi Advisory Opinions March 07, 2008: No. 2008-00080 (March 7, 2008)

Up to Mississippi Advisory Opinions

Collection: Mississippi Attorney General Opinions
Docket: No. 2008-00080
Date: March 7, 2008

Advisory Opinion Text

Mississippi Attorney General Opinions

2008.

Current through 2008 Legislative Session

No. 2008-00080.

DOCK: 2008-00080



March 7, 2008

DOCK: 2008-00080

AUTH: Phil Carter

DATE: 20080307

RQNM: Connie Cochran

SUBJ: Elections

SBCD: 76

The Honorable Connie Cochran
Chairman, Hinds County Election Commission
Post Office Box 946
Jackson, Mississippi 39205-0946

Re: Voting Machine Warranty Payments

Dear Ms. Cochran:

Attorney General Jim Hood received your letter of request and assigned it to me for research and reply.

Background

You state that upon the purchase of the current voting system, Hinds County entered into an agreement for an annual payment for a warranty on said system.

Issue Presented

You ask whether, pursuant to Mississippi Code Annotated Section 23-15-393 (Revised 2007) the annual warranty payment may be made from the interest paid from the HAVA funds that were reimbursed to Hinds County for the purchase of the system.

Response

Whether the payment is authorized is a question of fact to be determined by the Hinds County Board of Supervisors subject to judicial review.

Applicable Law and Conclusion

Section 23-15-393 (2) provides in part:

The county board of supervisors of any county having a population greater than two hundred fifty thousand (250,000) according to the 2000 federal decennial census shall create a special fund to deposit any monies received by such county for reimbursement to comply with the "Help America Vote Act of 2002" for direct recording electronic voting equipment purchased within five (5) years preceding the effective date of this act. Monies deposited in such special fund shall be used by such county board of supervisors only to upgrade direct recording electronic voting equipment, to purchase additional voting equipment or to improve such voting equipment.

If the board of supervisors determines that the expenditure in question is for the purpose of upgrading direct recording electronic voting equipment or improving such voting equipment, the interest earned from the HAVA funds may be used to make such expenditure.

Sincerely,

JIM HOOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL

By: Phil Carter

Special Assistant Attorney General