Skip to main content

Nebraska Advisory Opinions February 11, 1986: AGO 86012 (February 11, 1986)

Up to Nebraska Advisory Opinions

Collection: Nebraska Attorney General Opinions
Docket: AGO 86012
Date: Feb. 11, 1986

Advisory Opinion Text

Senator Lee Rupp, Chairman

AGO 86012

No. 86012

Nebraska Attorney General Opinions

State of Nebraska office of the Attorney General

February 11, 1986

Date: February 5, 1986

A. EUGENE CRUMP, Deputy Attorney General.

SUBJECT: "One Person, One Vote": Its Application to the Board of Regents Student Members

REQUESTED BY: Senator Lee Rupp, Chairman Constitutional Revision and Recreation Committee

WRITTEN BY: Robert M. Spire, Attorney General, Yvonne E. Gates, Assistant Attorney General.

You questioned whether granting voting rights to student members of the University of Nebraska Board of Regents would violate Article i, Section 22 of the Nebraska Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The Free Elections Clause, Neb. Const. art. I, §22, demands that each qualified voter be free to exercise the right to vote with6ut any impediment. The general election of the Board of Regents by district is free and open to all electors of the district. Likewise, the process of electing a Student Body President for each of the university campuses does not impede the right of any student voter. Therefore we see no violation of the Nebraska Constitution in this respect.

The Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution presents a more complex situation. The 1974 Amendment to Article VII, Section 10 of the Nebraska Constitution in effect appoints the Student Body President of each campus to the Board of Regents. That the Board of Regents is comprised of both elected and appointed members does not contravene the Equal Protection Clause. In Sailors v. Board of Education, the United States Supreme Court ruled "At least as respects nonlegislative officers, a State can appoint local officials or elect them or combine the elective and appointive systems as was done here." 387 U.S. 105, 111 (1967). The question then must focus on whether the Board of Regents is a legislative or administrative body.

The board appears to be legislative based on a cursory reading of its bylaws and empowering statute. Neb.Rev.Stat. $85-106 specifically grants: "The Board of Regents shall have power (1) to enact laws for the government of the university; The board's authority also includes the election of university presidents, deans, chancellors and others. It prepares and controls the annual budget, generally determines policy and sets guidelines for the university. However, the Nebraska Supreme Court stated that the Board of Regents is an administrative agency of the state with power to make rules and regulations germane to its legislated purpose. Board of Regents v. County of Lancaster , 48 N.W.2d 221, 154 Nab. 398 (1951). Because the Board of Regents is basically an administrative unit of the state exercising limited governmental powers, an election of regents is not required. The principle of "one person, one vote" only applies to elections of officials with essentially legislative responsibility. It does not apply to the Board of Regents.

Additionally, we call to your attention that Neb. Rev. Stat. §85-103 was not revised subsequent to the 1974 amendment to Article VII, Section 10. It does not provide for student membership on the Board of Regents and, consequently, is in conflict with the constitution.

Sincerely yours,

ROBERT M. SPIRE Attorney General.

Yvonne E. Gates, Assistant Attorney General.