New Mexico Regulations § 1.8.3.14 HEARING OFFICERS; SUMMARY DISPOSITION; HEARINGS; INTERPRETERS; EVIDENCE
Regulation Text
A.
The commission shall authorize the director to contract, for reasonable hourly compensation, with qualified persons to act as hearing officers. Hearing officers shall be assigned to act on or preside over hearings on complaints. Hearing officers must be currently licensed attorneys, or retired judges of the appellate, district, or metropolitan courts of New Mexico or any federal court, who are familiar with the ethics and election laws enforced by the commission. A hearing officer shall conduct a hearing fairly and impartially. A hearing officer who determines whether a complaint is supported by probable cause pursuant to Subsection B of Section
1.8.3.13
NMAC shall not preside over a hearing on the merits of the same complaint.
B.
All hearings before the hearing officer will occur in Santa Fe or Albuquerque, or at such other location within the state as may be determined by the hearing officer. In selecting the location of a hearing other than in Santa Fe or Albuquerque, the hearing officer shall consider and give weight to the location and reasonable concerns of the respective parties, witnesses, and representatives in the proceeding. Upon a showing by any party of an undue burden, the hearing officer may move the hearing to a more appropriate venue.
C.
If a hearing officer has not already notified the parties of a hearing through the issuance of a scheduling order, the director will notify the parties to the hearing by mail, directed to the address provided by the parties, of the date, time, and place scheduled for the hearing, at least 15 days before the scheduled hearing.
D.
The hearing shall be conducted pursuant to the rules of evidence governing proceedings in the state courts, Rule 11-101 NMRA, and these procedural rules. In the event of a conflict between these procedural rules and the rules of evidence governing proceedings in the state courts, these procedural rules control. All hearings shall be open to the public in accordance with the Open Meetings Act, Section
10-15-1
NMSA 1978, except for hearings or portions thereof exempted from the requirements of that Act.
E.
Audio recordings shall be made of all hearings conducted pursuant to this section.
F.
The parties may be represented by counsel, who shall enter an appearance at the earliest opportunity, pursuant to Paragraph (7) of Subsection A of
1.8.3.9
NMAC.
G.
The hearing officer shall permit the general counsel to intervene upon request. If the complaint was initiated by the commission under Paragraph (1) of Subsection C of Section
10-16G-5
NMSA 1978 and Subsection E of
1.8.3.9
NMAC, then the executive director shall represent the commission at the hearing.
H.
The hearing officer shall have the duty to conduct fair and impartial hearings, to take all necessary action to avoid delay in the proceedings and to maintain order. The hearing officer shall have the powers necessary to carry out these duties, including the following:
(1)
to administer or have administered oaths and affirmations;
(2)
to cause depositions to be taken;
(3)
to require the production or inspection of documents and other items;
(4)
to require the answering of interrogatories and requests for admissions;
(5)
to rule upon offers of proof and receive evidence;
(6)
to regulate the course of the hearings and the conduct of the parties and their representatives therein;
(7)
to issue a scheduling order, schedule a prehearing conference for simplification of the issues, or any other proper purpose;
(8)
to schedule, continue and reschedule hearings;
(9)
to consider and rule upon all procedural and other motions appropriate in the proceeding;
(10)
to require the filing of briefs on specific legal issues prior to or after the hearing;
(11)
to cause a complete audio record of hearings to be made;
(12)
to make and issue decisions and orders; and
(13)
to reprimand, or with warning in extreme instances exclude from the hearing, any person for engaging in a continuing pattern of disruptive or other improper conduct that interferes with the conduct of a fair and orderly hearing or development of a complete record.
I.
In the performance of these adjudicative functions, the hearing officer is prohibited from engaging in any improper
ex parte
communications about the substantive issues with any party on any matter, but may communicate with parties separately solely on scheduling issues if all parties are notified of such communications and do not object to them. An improper
ex parte
communication occurs when the hearing officer discusses the substance of a case without the opposing party being present, except that it is not an improper
ex parte
communication for the hearing officer to go on the record with only one party when the other party has failed to appear at a scheduled hearing despite having received timely notice thereof.
J.
Parties who appear at the hearing may:
(1)
request the director to request the commission's authority to petition a district court to compel the presence of witnesses. Subpoenas may be requested by the commission from a district court in the same manner as provided for in Subsection J of Section
10-16G-10
NMSA 1978 and Subsections C and D of
1.8.3.11
NMAC;
(2)
present evidence and testimony;
(3)
examine and cross-examine witnesses; and
(4)
introduce evidentiary material developed by the general counsel. Before the hearing, the general counsel shall timely disclose to the parties all evidence in the possession or within the control of the general counsel, other than privileged information.
K.
Evidence shall be presented by the parties at the hearing consistent with the terms agreed to in a prehearing conference or as set forth in a scheduling order entered under Subsection H of
1.8.3.14
NMAC. The hearing officer may allow a deviation from the agreed-upon process for good cause.
(1)
The general counsel shall present any evidence collected in the investigation relating to the complaint that is relevant to the matters at issue as set forth in the general counsel's findings under Subsection A of
1.8.3.12
NMAC; evidence that is agreed to be relevant by the parties; or evidence that is allowed by the hearing officer. If the general counsel has intervened as a party pursuant to Section G of
1.8.3.14
NMAC, the general counsel must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to seek prehearing discovery necessary to meet any anticipated defense raised by the respondent to the claims identified in the specification of violations prepared by the general counsel pursuant to Subsection B of
1.8.3.13
NMAC.
(2)
The respondent may present evidence that is relevant to the matters at issue as set forth in the general counsel's findings under Subsection A of
1.8.3.12
NMAC; evidence that is agreed to be relevant by the parties; or evidence that is otherwise allowed by the hearing officer.
(3)
The general counsel or the general counsel's designee may authenticate evidence produced during an investigation if the source of the evidence declines a request to appear and testify about the evidence and the hearing officer determines that there are no other reasonable means for authenticating the evidence.
L.
Any person may timely file an amicus brief, not to exceed ten pages, with the director, for consideration by the hearing officer.
M.
Upon reasonable notice by the party to the director, a party needing language interpreter services for translation of one language into another, and any interpreter required to be provided under the American with Disabilities Act, shall be provided for by the commission. While the person serving as an interpreter need not be a court-certified interpreter in order to provide interpretation at a hearing, any person serving as an interpreter in a hearing before the commission must affirm the interpreter's oath applicable in courts across this state.
N.
After the termination of the hearing, or in lieu of a hearing if, upon a motion by a party or the general counsel, the hearing officer concludes there is no genuine dispute as to any material facts, the hearing officer shall issue written findings and conclusions on whether the evidence establishes that the respondent's conduct as alleged in the complaint constitutes a violation of any law within the jurisdiction of the commission. The hearing officer's written decision:
(1)
may
(a)
impose any fines provided for by law; and
(b)
recommend to the appropriate authority commensurate disciplinary action against the respondent;
(2)
and must
(a)
state the reasons for the hearing officer's decision; and
(b)
provide the parties with notice of the right of appeal to the commission.
O.
Clear and convincing evidence is required to support a finding by a hearing officer that a respondent's conduct was fraudulent or willful.
P.
If the hearing officer finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the respondent's conduct as alleged in the complaint constituted a violation of the Governmental Conduct Act and was either unintentional or for good cause, then the hearing officer shall give the respondent 10 days to correct the violation, pursuant to Subsection B of Section
10-16-13.1
NMSA 1978, before taking any action under Subsection N of
1.8.3.14
NMAC.
Q.
If the hearing officer finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the respondent's conduct as alleged in the complaint does not constitute a violation of any law within the jurisdiction of the commission, the hearing officer, in a written decision, shall dismiss the complaint and inform the complainant of their right to appeal to the commission.
R.
A party may request copies of evidence considered by the hearing officer or a copy of the audio recording of the hearing by submitting a written request to the director. The director may charge a reasonable fee for copies made, consistent with its fee schedule under the Inspection of Public Records Act. The director may also require the requesting party to submit a new, sealed computer storage device, such as a compact disc, dvd disc, or usb drive, or other tangible device for copying of any audio or video recording that is part of the administrative record. Every party is responsible for paying the cost of any transcription of the audio recording.
History
Adopted by
Explore Related Documents
This section contains links to related documents with the same tags to allow you quickly access other relevant legal materials. These links include document types and counts, enabling you to explore similar content efficiently.