Skip to main content

North Carolina Cases March 02, 2022: Holmes v. Moore

Up to North Carolina Cases

Court: North Carolina Supreme Court
Date: March 2, 2022

Case Description

868 S.E.2d 315 (Mem)

Jabari HOLMES, Fred Culp, Daniel E. Smith, Brendon Jaden Peay, and Paul Kearney, Sr.
v.
Timothy K. MOORE, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives; Philip E. Berger, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate; David R. Lewis, in his official capacity as Chairman of the House Select Committee on Elections for the 2018 Third Extra Session; Ralph E. Hise, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Elections for the 2018 Third Extra Session; The State of North Carolina; and The North Carolina State Board of Elections

No. 342PA19-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 2, 2022

Allison J. Riggs, Attorney at Law, For Holmes, Jabari, et al.

Jeffrey Loperfido, Attorney at Law, For Holmes, Jabari, et al.

Nathan A. Huff, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Moore, Timothy K. (Official Capacity), et al.

Nicole J. Moss, Attorney at Law, For Moore, Timothy K. (Official Capacity), et al.

Terence Steed, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina, et al.

Laura H. McHenry, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of North Carolina, et al.

Mary Carla Babb, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of North Carolina, et al.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs on the 14th of January 2022 in this matter for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 prior to a determination by the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd of March 2022."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of January 2022 by Plaintiffs for Expedited Consideration of Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd of March 2022."

[868 S.E.2d 316]

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(1).