Skip to main content

North Carolina Cases September 02, 2022: Cmty. Success Initiative v. Moore

Up to North Carolina Cases

Court: North Carolina Supreme Court
Date: Sept. 2, 2022

Case Description

876 S.E.2d 758 (Mem)

COMMUNITY SUCCESS INITIATIVE; Justice Served NC, Inc. ; Wash Away Unemployment; North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP; Timothy Locklear ; Drakarus Jones; Susan Marion; Henry Harrison ; Ashley Cahoon; and Shakita Norman
v.
Timothy K. MOORE, in His Official Capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives; Philip E. Berger, in His Official Capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate; the North Carolina State Board of Elections; Damon Circosta, in His Official Capacity as Chairman of the North Carolina State Board of Elections; Stella Anderson, in Her Official Capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina State Board of Elections; Kenneth Raymond, in His Official Capacity as Member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections; Jeff Carmon in His Official Capacity as Member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections; and David C. Black, in His Official Capacity as Member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections

No. 331PA21

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 2, 2022

Nicole J. Moss, Attorney at Law, For Moore, Timothy K., et al.

Nathan A. Huff, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Moore, Timothy K., et al.

Daryl V. Atkinson, Attorney at Law, For Community Success Initiative, et al.

Whitley J. Carpenter, Attorney at Law, For Community Success Initiative, et al.

Kathleen F. Roblez, Attorney at Law, For Community Success Initiative, et al.

Ashley Mitchell, Attorney at Law, For Community Success Initiative, et al.

Terence Steed, Assistant Attorney General, For State Board of Elections.

Stephen D. Feldman, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Community Success Initiative, et al.

Matthew W. Sawchak, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Community Success Initiative, et al.

Adam K. Doerr, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, For Community Success Initiative, et al.

Caitlin Swain, Attorney at Law, For Community Success Initiative, et al.

Paul Mason Cox, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State Board of Elections.

Jared M. Burtner, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Moore, Timothy K., et al.

Kellie Z. Myers, Trial Court Administrator.

David Thompson, Attorney at Law, For Moore, Timothy K., et al.

Peter Patterson, Attorney at Law, For Moore, Timothy K., et al.

Joseph O. Masterman, Attorney at Law, For Moore, Timothy K., et al.

William V. Bergstrom, Attorney at Law, For Moore, Timothy K., et al.

Mary Carla Babb, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State Board of Elections.

R. Stanton Jones, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, For Community Success Initiative, et al.

Abraham Rubert-Schewel, Attorney at Law, For Cato Institute, et al.

Sarah Laws, Attorney at Law, For North Carolina Justice Center, et al.

Laura Holland, Attorney at Law, For North Carolina Justice Center, et al.

Quisha Mallette, Attorney at Law, For North Carolina Justice Center, et al.

Anne Harvey, Attorney at Law, For Institute for Innovation in Prosecution at John Jay College.

Caroline P. Mackie, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For District of Columbia, et al.

Elisabeth S. Theodore, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, For Community Success Initiative, et al.

Farbod K. Faraji, Attorney at Law, For Community Success Initiative, et al.

Paul E. Smith, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, For Sentencing Project, et al.

Burton Craige, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Sentencing Project, et al.

Lloyd B. Chinn, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, For Institute for Innovation in Prosecution at John Jay College.

Joseph C. O'Keefe, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, For Institute for Innovation in Prosecution at John Jay College.

Caroline S. Van Zile, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, For District of Columbia, et al.

[876 S.E.2d 759]

ORDER

The Legislative-Defendants’ motion for extension of time is denied. The Court, on its own motion, extends the deadline for the filing of their principal reply brief to 9 September 2022. The Legislative-Defendants’ reply brief to the amici briefs remains due on 19 September 2022.

By order of the Court in Conference, this the 2nd day of September, 2022.