Skip to main content

South Carolina Advisory Opinions May 14, 1991: Opinion concerning the constitutionality of S.341, which would provide that the Presidents of the South Carolina Federation of Republican Women and the South Carolina Federation Of Democratic Women will be ex officio members of their respective State committees.

Up to South Carolina Advisory Opinions

Collection: South Carolina Attorney General Opinions
Date: May 14, 1991

Advisory Opinion Text

Office of the Attorney General, State of South Carolina

May 14, 1991

The Honorable Joe Wilson
Senator, District No. 23
606 Gressette Senate Office Building
Columbia, South Carolina 29202

Dear Senator Wilson:

By your letter of April 17, 1991, you have asked for the opinion of this Office as to the constitutionality of S.341, which would provide that the Presidents of the South Carolina Federation of Republican Women and the South Carolina Federation of Democratic Women will be ex officio members of their respective State committees .

Political party officers do not hold State offices and therefore although the selection process is statutorily created, it governs a non-public office. 63A Am.Jur.2d Public Officers and Employees , §21; 29 C.J.S., Elections , §83 (a); State v. Bivens , 149 S.E.2d 284 (W. Va. 1966); see also , opinion to Mr. Burkhalter from J. Emory Smith, July 29, 1986" The constitutional guarantees apply to public offices and generally not office holders in private organizations. Therefore, no readily discernible constitutional issues are apparent from this proposed bill.

Of course, should the bill be enacted, in considering the constitutionality of an act of the General Assembly, it is presumed that the act is constitutional in all respects. Moreover, such an act will not be considered void unless its unconstitutionality is clear beyond any reasonable doubt. Thomas v. Macklen , 186 S.C. 290, 195 S.E. 539 (1937); Townsend v. Richland County , 190 S.C. 270, 2 S.E.2d 777 (1939). All doubts of constitutionality are generally resolved in favor of constitutionality. While this Office may comment upon potential constitutional problems, it is

Page 2

solely within the province of the courts of this State to declare an act unconstitutional.

Sincerely,

/s/
Treva G. Ashworth
Senior Assistant Attorney General

TGA:bvc
Attachment

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

/s/ _________
Edwin E. Evans
Chief Deputy Attorney General

/s/ _________
ROBERT D. COOK
Executive Assistant for Opinions