Skip to main content

Texas Advisory Opinions April 29, 1948: AGO V-560 (April 29, 1948)

Up to Texas Advisory Opinions

Collection: Texas Attorney General Opinions
Docket: AGO V-560
Date: April 29, 1948

Advisory Opinion Text

Texas Attorney General Opinions

1948.

No. V-0560 (1948).




1


April 29, 1948

Hon. John Atchison
County Attorney
Cooke County
Gainesville, Texas

Opinion No. V-560

Re: Compensation of election judges and clerks in primary elections.

Dear Sir:

You have requested this office to advise you whether the compensation of election judges and clerks in primary elections is governed by the provisions of Article 2943, V. C. S., which reads as follows:

"Judges and clerks of general and special elections shall be paid Five Dollars ($5.00) a day each, and Fifty Cents (50$) per hour each for any time in excess of a day's work as herein defined. The judge who delivers the returns of election immediately after the votes have been counted shall be paid Two Dollars ($2.00) for that service; provided, also, he shall make returns of all election supplies not used when he makes return of the election. Ten (10) working hours shall be considered a day within the meaning of this Article. The compensation of judges and clerks of general and special elections shall be paid by the County Treasurer of the county where such services are rendered upon order of the Commissioners."

Title 50 entitled "Elections" contains Articles 2923 through 3173 inclusive. Chapter 13 of Title 50 entitled "Nominations" pertains to primary elections and contains Articles 3100 through 3167 inclusive. We quote the following statutory provisions applicable to primary elections pertinent to your inquiry:

Article 3104, V. C. S., reads as follows:

"All the precinct primary elections




2


of a party shall be conducted by a presiding judge, to be appointed by a chairman of the county executive committee of the party, with the assistance and approval of at least a majority of the members of the county executive committee. Such presiding judge shall select an associate judge and two clerks to assist in conducting the election; two supervisors may be chosen by any one-fourth of the party condidates, who, with the judges and clerks, shall take the oath required of such officers in general elections. Two additional clerks may be appointed, but only when, in the opinion of the presiding judge, there will be more than one hundred votes polled at the primary election in the precinct."

Article 3108, V. C. S., reads as follows:

"At the meeting of the county executive committee provided in Article 3117, the county committee shall also carefully estimate the cost of printing the official ballots, renting polling places where same may be found necessary, providing and distributing all necessary poll books, blank stationery and voting booths required, compensation of election officers and clerks and messengers , to report the result in each precinct to the county chairman, as provided for herein, and all other necessary expenses of holding such primaries in such counties and shall apportion such cost among the various candidates for nomination for county and precinct offices only as herein defined, and offices to be filled by the voters of such county or precinct only (candidates for State offices excepted), in such manner as in their judgment is just and equitable, giving due consideration to the importance and emoluments of each such office for which a nomination is to be made and shall, by resolution, direct the chairman to immediately mail to each person whose name has been requested to be placed on the official ballot a statement of the amount of such




3


expense so apportioned to him, with the request that he pay the same to the county chairman on or before the Saturday before the fourth Monday in June thereafter."

In the case of Beene v. Waples, 108 Tex. 140, 187 S.W. 191, it was held that the election officers of a second senatorial primary election were to be paid under the provisions of the General Primary Law providing for the method of defraying the expenses of primary elections (now Article 3108, V. C. S.) and not under the provisions of the General Election Law (now Article 2943, V. C. S.) We quote the following from said case:

"If section 34 should be construed as meaning that the election officers referred to therein (by which are meant, we think, the primary election officers provided for in said act of 1905) are to be paid, for their services, out of public funds, such provision for payment is, plainly, unconstitutional, as directing a misuse of public funds. Waples v. Marrast, 184 S.W. 180, recently decided by this court.

"But if section 34 is to be construed and held to mean that such election officers are to be paid out of funds provided by reasonable assessments against candidates for party nominations, in all respects as set forth in and provided by said act of 1905 in its relation to the primary election officers referred to therein, there exists no conflict whatever between said section 34 and any other provision of that Constitution or of the Constitution of the United States, and in that event section 34 will stand as a valid expression of legislative will and authority.

"We here adopt, as sound, said latter construction of said section 34, and affirm its constitutionality.

"It will be noted that the above quoted section 34 of the Senatorial Primary Law




4


does not provide that the expense of holding senatorial primary elections shall be paid out of public funds. Instead of containing any such declaration, it says that that expense shall be paid 'as provided by law for holding elections in other cases.' As provided by what law? This means necessarily, we think, the General Primary Law. The section (section 34), and the act of 1913, of which it is a part, do not deal with general elections for a particular purpose - the nomination of candidates for United States Senator. There could be no reasonable warrant, therefore, for looking to the General Election Law as the law intended by the reference in said section 34 in its relation to the payment of expenses of senatorial primaries, since the General Election Law is not a law upon the same subject. As a matter of reason, if there be a general law upon the same general subject, that is the law to be looked to as, necessarily, the law which the Legislature, in framing section 34, intended shall govern the matter.

" We have the General Primary Law with its distinct provision for the method of defraying the expenses of primary elections, and resort should accordingly, be made to that law as the law on the subject intended by the reference in section 34. The provisions of the General Primary Law (the act of 1905) is for the payment of such expenses, not out of public funds, but by assessment against state, district, county, and precinct candidates." (Emphasis ours)

You are, therefore, advised that the compensation of election judges and clerks in primary elections is not governed by the provisions of Article 2943, V. C. S., applicable to general and special elections, but said expense is to be paid in accordance with the provisions of Article 3108 setting forth the method of defraying the expenses of a primary election.




5


SUMMARY

Election judges and clerks in primary elections cannot be paid for their services under the provisions of Article 2943 V. C. S., applicable to general and special elections, but they must be paid in accordance with the provisions of Article 3108 V. C. S., providing for the method of defraying expenses in primary elections.


Yours very truly,
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
By /s
John Reeves
Assistant
APPROVED:

/s
FIRST ASSISTANT
ATTORNEY GENERAL
JR:mw