Skip to main content

Texas Advisory Opinions November 05, 1949: AGO V-944 (November 5, 1949)

Up to Texas Advisory Opinions

Collection: Texas Attorney General Opinions
Docket: AGO V-944
Date: Nov. 5, 1949

Advisory Opinion Text

Texas Attorney General Opinions

1949.

No. V-0944 (1949).




1


November 5, 1949

Hon. Gene H. Mixson
County Attorney
Lipscomb County
Higgins, Texas

Opinion No. V-944

Re: The authority of the trustees of an independent school district to sell unused school houses of dormant school districts following their consolidation

Dear Mr. Mixson:

We refer to your request presenting, in substance, the following data and question:

The Lipscomb County School Board, acting under Article VIII of Senate Bill 116, 51st Legislature, (codified as Art.2922-18, in Vernon's Civil Statutes) by order consolidated Common School Districts NOS. 8, 9, 11 and a part of 6, all being dormant school districts, with the Higgins Independent School District in such county. .Elections have been held wherein bonded indebtedness has been assumed and provision for levying a maintenance tax has been made.

Located in the new district are three abandoned school houses which were used, at one time, by the dormant Common School Districts. School has not been held in them for many years. They are standing in disuse, unrepaired, and are rapidly deteriorating. If sold, they will probably bring $200 to $400 a piece.

Question: May the Board of Trustees of Higgins Independent School District sell these abandoned school houses and invest the proceeds in more convenient and desirable school property? If so, must the consent of State Department of Education be obtained?

We assume for purposes of this opinion that the




2


buildings in question were acquired wereor constructed and maintained with public money; that they are owned and held in truat for school purposes.

Article VIII of Senate Bill 116, Acts 51st Legislature, provides in part as follows:

"... the Board of Trustees for the district with which such dormant school district is consolidated shall continue to serve, and be, the Board of Trustees for the new district. In each such case, the consolidation order of the County Board of Trustees shall define by legal boundary description the territory of the new district as so enlarged and extended, and said order, including the description of the district, shall be recorded in the minutes of the County Board of Trustees and otherwise as provided by law. Elections shall be held in such consolidated districts for the assumption of outstanding bonds, if any, for the levying of taxes therefor, and for the levying of a local maintenance tax; said elections to be ordered and held as now provided by law." (Emphasis added).

Temple I.S.D v. Proctor 97 S.W.2d 1047 (Tex. Civ.App.1936, error ref.) holds that Article 2780 is applicable to all types of Independent school districts, whether in incorporated cities or not.

Article 2780, Vernon's Civil Statutes, provides:

"Said trustees shall adopt such rules, regulations and by-laws as they may deem proper, and the public free schools of such Independent school district shall be under their control; and they shall have the exclusive power to manage and govern said schools, and all rights and titles to property for school purposes heretofore vested in the mayor, city councils, or school trustees by Articles 3995, 4013 and 4032, Revised Statutes of 1895, or other statutes, general and special, except such cities as are exempted by this title, shall be vested in said board of trustees and their successors in office, and their claims




3


shall apply to any section or suit which may arise to which said board is a party."

Under the express provisions of Article VIII of Senate Bill 116, a new district was created when the county board by its order consolidated the dormant districts to the Higgins Independent School District. The trustees of former Higgins district are now the trustees of the enlarged new Higgins Independent School District. The former common school districts, defined as dormant in Article VIII, by reason of their consolidation with the Higgins district, have ceased to exist. State v. Cadenhead, 129 S.W.2d 743 (Tex.Civ.App.1939, error ref.). Thus, the school properties, title to which prior to the consolidation was vested in the boards of trustees of the dormant common school districts, Is now vested in the Board of Trustees of the Higgins Independent School District and their successors in office by reason of the consolidation and in accordance with the provisions of Article 2780, V.C.S., Love v. City of Dallas, 120 Tex. 251, 40 S.W. 2d 20, at p. 26 (1931); Houston v. Gonzales I.S.D., 229 S.W. 467, (Comm. App. 1921); Lander v. Victoria County, 131 S. W. 821, (Tex. Civ. App. 1910); 37 Tex. Jur. 946, Schools, Sec. 79; A.G. Opinions Nos. 0-5354 and 0-7265.

With respect to the authority of the board of trustees of an independent school district to sell school property of the district we quote from Article 2773:

"Any houses or lands held in trust by any city or town for public free school purposes may be sold for the purpose of investing in more convenient and desirable school property, with the consent of the State Board, by the board of school trustees of such city or town; and, in such case, the president of the school board shall execute his deed to the purchaser for the same, reciting the resolution of the State Board giving consent thereto and the resolution of the board of trustees authorizing such sale."

Previous Attorney General opinions 0-415 and 0-1570 hold that the procedure to be followed by boards of trustees of independent districts in selling abandoned school buildings and grounds is that provided in Article 2773, V.C.S. R.B. Spencer & Co. v. Brown, 198 S.W. 1179, (Tex. Civ. App. 1917, error ref.). Opinion 0-1570




4


further holds that independent school districts may dispose of property no longer needed for school purposes, only if it is necessary to do so to acquire other property which is more suitable; that such property may not be sold for the purpose of putting the proceeds in the local maintenance fund of the district.

With the foregoing in mind, it is our opinion that the Board of Trustees of the Higgins Independent School District may dispose of the abandoned buildings in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 2773. This law requires that the board of trustees meet and adopt a resolution evidencing their decision to sell the buildings. Then the consent resolution of the State Board of Education must be secured, and finally the president of the Higgins Board of Trustees must execute the deed to the purchaser. The two resolutions should recite the purpose of the sale, and the deed should refer to both resolutions.

SUMMARY

Abandoned school buildings in dormant districts consolidated with an independent school district under Article VIII of Senate Bill 116, Acts of the 51st Legislature, may be sold by the board of trustees of the newly created school district in accordance with the provisions of Article 2773, V.C.S. Art. 2780, V.C.S.; Love v City of Dallas, 120 Tex. 351, 40 S.W.2d 20; Houston v. Gonzales I.S.D. 229 S.W. 467; Lander v. Victoria County, 131 S.W. 821; R.B. Spencer & Co. v. Brown, 198 S.W. 1179; A.G. Opinions Nos. 0-415, 0-1570, 0-5354, 0-7265.


Yours very truly
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
By /s
James E. Ferguson Assistant
Chester E. Ollison Assistant
APPROVED

/s
ATTORNEY GENERAL
JKF:CEO:bh:nw