Skip to main content

Texas Advisory Opinions March 13, 1959: AGO WW-572 (March 13, 1959)

Up to Texas Advisory Opinions

Collection: Texas Attorney General Opinions
Docket: AGO WW-572
Date: March 13, 1959

Advisory Opinion Text

Texas Attorney General Opinions

1959.

No. WW-0572 (1959).




1


March 13, 1959

Hon. Harold B. Parish, Chairman
Privileges, Suffrages and
Election Committee
House of Representatives
Austin, Texas

Opinion No. WW-572

Re: Constitutionality of H.B. 17 and H.B. 26, 56th Leg., relating to declaration of party affiliation.

Dear Mr. Parish:

This is in response to your request for the opinion of this office as to the constitutionality of H.B. 17 and H. B. 26.

H. B. 26 proposes to amend the election code of this State by adding thereto a new section immediately after Section 179, which is codified as Article 1301 of Vernon's Election Code. In general this bill prescribes certain qualifications and conditions which a voter must meet to be qualified to vote in the primary elections of a political party and participate in the conventions and other affairs of the party. In order to vote in the primary elections and to participate in the conventions and affairs of the political party, the voter must designate his party affiliation at the time he applies for his poll tax receipt or exemption certificate, or he may decline to so classify himself with respect to party affiliation. Persons who have not designated political party affiliation are disqualified to participate in the election and convention procedures. Any person who has designated a party affiliation in such manner may thereafter change such political party affiliation during the year for which his poll tax receipt or exemption certificate is effective, or any person who has declined to declare political party affiliation in his initial application may at any time within a period beginning the first day of October and ending 30 days preceding the primary election or convention in which he desires to vote or participate, declare himself to be a member of a single political party by appearing before the county tax assessor-collector and making the required declaration, whereupon he is issued a party affiliation certificate.




2


The Act further provides that any person who votes or attempts to vote in a primary election held by a political party on a certification of declaration of party affiliation other than the one most recently issued to him shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to a fine of not less than $20.00 nor more than $200.00.

H.B. 17 provides that every poll tax receipt issued shall, among other items, show the political party affiliation of the taxpayer, the purpose thereof being stated in the emergency clause as providing a method whereby a person may list his political party affiliation in order to be eligible to vote in the primaries.

The right of a citizen to cast his ballot and thus participate in the selection of those who control his government is one of the fundamental prerogatives of citizenship. Sanchez v. Bravo ,. 251 S.W. 2d 935, 938 (Tex.Civ.App. 1952). Grave doubt arises as to the validity of any act which operates as an interference with the privilege of free suffrage guaranteed by our Constitution. Westerman v. Mims , 111 Tex. 29, 227 S.W. 178, 181 (1921).

The qualifications of a voter in this State are defined in Article VI, Section '2 of the Constitution. The Supreme Court of Texas in a recent case clearly pointed out that the Legislature is not authorized to prescribe any other standard for voters than that of qualified electors as defined in the Constitution. In King v. Carlton Independent School District , 156 Tex. 365, 295 S.W. 2d 408, (1956) Chief Justice Hickman said:

"Article VI, Section 2, of the Constitution defines a qualified voter in this language:

"'Every person subject to none of the foregoing disqualifications who shall have attained the age of twenty-one (21) years and who shall be a citizen of the United States and who shall have resided in this State one (1) year next preceding an election and the last six (6) months within the district or county in which such person offers to vote, shall be deemed a qualified elector; * * *' * * *.

"Any qualified elector, as defined by that Article, is entitled to vote in any election




3


other than one for which additional qualifications are prescribed by some other provision of the Constitution. The Legislature was not authorized to prescribe any other standard for voters at the adoption election than that of qualified electors as defined by Article VI, Section 2."

It is apparent that the proposed legislation would add an additional standard over and above the constitutional definition of a qualified elector, namely, that said voter shall, either at the time of the payment of his poll tax or in any event no later than thirty days prior to the primary election, then declare his party affiliation which in turn is made a condition or qualification of his voting in the primary elections. The qualifications of a voter are prescribed in the Constitution and the imposition of this additional qualification is therefore unconstitutional.

The question remains as to whether primary elections are the type elections in which a qualified voter has any fundamental prerogative or constitutional right of participation, or whether such rights relate only to a general election. While it has been ably contended to the contrary, it is clear that the Supreme Court of the United States has foreclosed this question and that the right to vote in a primary election for the nomination of candidates, like the right to vote in a general election, is a right secured by the Constitution. Smith v. Allwright , 64 S.W. 757, 321 U.S. 649, 88 L. Ed. 987; Terry V. Adams , 73 S. Ct. 809, 345 U. S. 461, 97 L. Ed. 1152.

This opinion is limited to the conflict of the proposed legislation with the constitutional qualifications of a voter to participate in elections.

SUMMARY

Insofar as H. B. 17 and H. B. 26 attempt, to prescribe as a qualification for participation in primary elections that a voter




4


otherwise qualified under the Constitution designate his political choice prior to said election, they conflict with the provisions of Article VI, Section 2 of the Constitution and are unconstitutional.


Yours very truly
WILL WILSON
Attorney General of Texas
By /s
Morgan Nesbitt
Assistant Attorney General
MN/fb
APPROVED:
OPINION COMMITTEE
Geo. P. Blackburn, Chairman
Dean Davis
Riley Fletcher
John Webster
REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
By: W. V. Geppert