Skip to main content

Texas Advisory Opinions December 21, 1971: AGO M-1018 (December 21, 1971)

Up to Texas Advisory Opinions

Collection: Texas Attorney General Opinions
Docket: AGO M-1018
Date: Dec. 21, 1971

Advisory Opinion Text

Texas Attorney General Opinions

1971.

No. M-1018 (1971).




4965


December 21, 1971

Honorable Doug Crouch
District Attorney Tarrant County Courthouse
Fort Worth, Texas 76102

Opinion No. M-1018

Re: Whether the inclusion of a presidential preferential question on the official primary election ballots of the political parties in Tarrant County would result in invalidation of the official ballots as to the other races on the ballot.

Dear Mr. Crouch:

You have requested an opinion from our office on the following question:

"Whether or not the inclusion of a presidential preferential question on the official primary election ballots of the political parties in Tarrant County would result in the invalidation of the official ballots as to the other races on the ballot."

The Texas Election Code provides the sole and exclusive method for the conduct and the holding of primary elections. Article 1.01(fn1) provides as follows:

"The aim in adopting this Code is to state in plain language the laws governing the nomination and election of officers and of holding other elections, to simplify, clarify and harmonize the existing laws in regard to parties, suffrage nominations, and elections , and to safeguard the purity of the ballot box against error, fraud, mistake and corruption , to the end that the will of the




4966


people shall prevail and that true democracy shall not perish from the Lone Star State. To that end the provisions of this Code shall apply to all elections and primaries held in this State, except as otherwise provided herein." (Emphasis added.)

Article 6.05 provides for the form of the official ballot in all elections in which presidential candidates' names appear on the ballot. Subdivision 4 of this Article specifies that the names of the candidates for President and Vice President shall appear on the ballot at the head of their respective tickets.

Article 6.07 provides a method for the legislature to submit proposed constitutional amendments or other questions to be voted upon by the electorate in primary elections. Article 13.33 provides that the official ballot as prescribed by Article 6.05 be used in the primary election and further specifies the exclusive method of submitting special referendum questions on the official primary ballot. Article 13.33 provides, in part, as follows:

"... The state executive committee may submit , at the general primary election, any demand for specific legislation on any subject, or any other matter, which may be proposed for inclusion in the platform or resolutions of the party , and upon petition of five per cent of the voters of the party, as shown by the total number of votes cast for Governor at the last preceding general primary, the state executive committee shall submit any such question or questions to the voters at the next general primary."

(Emphasis added.)

The Election Code does not provide for presidential preferential questions to be included on the official primary ballot.

The courts have held that the election laws, even though they may be mandatory in form, are construed as directory in the absence of fraud or unless the departure or irregularity has affected or changed the results of the election. Whiteside v. Brown , 214 S.W.2d 844 (Tex.Civ.App. 1948, error dis.); Minthorn v. Hale , 372 S.W.2d 752 (Tex.Civ.App. 1964, no writ).




4967


Sawyer v. Board of Regents of Clarendon Junior College , 393 S.W.2d 391 (Tex.Civ.App.1965, no writ).

Irregularities or minor departures from the express provisions of the Election Code do not normally affect the outcome of an election. However, in a situation which might arise, we are not presented with what irregularities, minor or gross in their nature, exist. Thus, we are faced with a hypothetical fact situation, wholly conjectural and speculative. It is contrary to the settled policy of this office to render an opinion on purely conjectural, hypothetical, or speculative questions.

We are unable to say whether or not a presidential preferential question willfully included on the official primary ballot of Tarrant County in direct contravention of the Election Code would constitute a fraud or would affect the outcome of the election. This factual determination would have to be made after a full investigation of all the relevant facts surrounding the election. This office has no authority to pass on questions of fact.

SUMMARY

There is no statutory authority to authorize the inclusion of a presidential preferential question on the official primary election ballots of the political parties of any county of the State.

It is contrary to the policy of this office to render opinions based on fact situations wholly conjectural and speculative, i.e. whether such an irregularity as the inclusion of a presidential preferential question on the primary ballot of political parties might affect the outcome of the election.


Yours very truly,

/s
CRAWFORD C. MARTIN
Attorney General of Texas
Prepared by E. L. Hamilton
Assistant Attorney General




4968


APPROVED:
OPINION COMMITTEE
Kerns Taylor, Chairman
W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman
W. O. Shultz
William J. Craig
Fisher Tyler
Lonny Zwiener
SAM McDANIEL
Staff Legal Assistant
ALFRED WALKER
Executive Assistant
NOLA WHITE
First Assistant

__________

Footnotes:

1 All articles referred to are V.A.T.S., Election Code, unless otherwise stated.