Skip to main content

Texas Advisory Opinions June 28, 1947: AGO V-278 (June 28, 1947)

Up to Texas Advisory Opinions

Collection: Texas Attorney General Opinions
Docket: AGO V-278
Date: June 28, 1947

Advisory Opinion Text

Texas Attorney General Opinions

1947.

No. V-0278 (1947).




1


June 28, 1947

Honorable Jim D. Bowmer,
County Attorney,
Bell County,
Belton, Texas

Opinion No. V-278

Re: Eligibility of Persons convicted of Federal felony to qualify as trustee of common school district.

Dear Sir:

We refer to your letter of recent date acknowledged by the Attorney General on June 16, 1947, wherein you request an opinion of this office concerning the eligibility of a person to be a trustee of a common school district who has been convicted of a Federal felony.

In your letter and excellent brief thereon, your present, in substance, the following facts:

A person was elected trustee of a common school district who was convicted and sentenced by a Federal District Court on three counts each of which is made a felony by Title 26, Section 2803, 2810 and 2856, U.S.C.A., the Federal Liquor Taxing Act, served four months in a Federal prison and who paid $600.00 in fines pursuant to such sentence. On two of the counts he could have been confined a maximum of two years; on the third count, a maximum of five years.

Title 18, Section 541, U.S.C.A., defines "felony" as an offense which may be punished by death or imprisonment for a term exceeding one year.

Article 2745, Section 1, V. C. S., providing for the election of trustees of common school districts and for their qualifications reads, in part:

"... Providing no person shall be qualified as trustee unless he is a property




2


taxpayer in the district to which he is elected and otherwise a qualified voter in such district... All vacancies shall be filled by the county board of trustees for the remainder of the term in which the vacancy occurs..."

Article VI, Section 1, Constitution of Texas, provides:

"The following classes of persons shall not be allowed to vote in this State, to-wit;

"...

"Fourth: All persons convicted of any felony, subject to such exceptions as the Legislature shall make."

Article 2954, V. C. S., provides in part:

"The following classes of persons shall not be entitled to vote in this State:

"...

"4. All persons convicted of any felony, except those restored to full citizenship and right of suffrage, or pardoned."

In accordance with the provisions of Article 2745, Section 1, unless the person is a qualified voter in the district, he is not eligible or qualified as a trustee of a common school district; and Article VI, Section 1 of the Constitution provides, in substance, that all persons convicted of any felony shall not be allowed to vote in this State subject to such exceptions as the Legislature shall make. The Legislature has made an exception in Article 2954 which provides, in substance, that those persons convicted of any felony who have been restored to full citizenship and right of suffrage, or pardoned, do not fall within the prohibitions of Article VI, Section 1 of the Constitution.

Should the above cited Texas laws incorporating the language, "convicted of any felony", be construed




3


to disfranchise also those persons who have been convicted of a Federal felony as well as those persons who have been convicted of an offense defined as a felony in the Texas laws? We think they should be so construed. We cannot subscribe to the proposition that the framers of our Constitution intended a thing so anomalous, illogical and unjust as to say that those guilty of certain crimes against the laws of the United States and sister States are eligible or qualified to vote in Texas, while those guilty of certain crimes against the laws of this state are ineligible.

In Harwell vs. Morris, 143 S. W. (2d) 809, an election contest case decided by the Amarillo Court of Civil Appeals, wherein it was proven that a person was convicted in a Federal court for violation of the Harrison Narcotic Act, and his punishment was assessed at six months in jail which was suspended for two years, it was held that such person was not qualified to vote in the primary election because under the provisions of the applicable Federal law he could have been confined in the Federal penitentiary by the Federal court. The punishment actually assessed by the court upon a trial does not control the class of the offense. R. M. Gordon vs. State, 135 Tex. Crim. Rep., 438; Attorney General's Opinion No. 0-4121.

In several other States which have constitutional and statutory provisions similar to the Texas laws herein quoted under Article VI, Section 1 of the Constitution, and Article 2954, it has been held that a conviction of a felony in a Federal court, or a court of another State or country, renders that person convicted ineligible or disqualifies him to vote in elections held in the State. See citations in 149 A.L.R. 1075.

Accordingly, it is our opinion, that a person who has been convicted of a Federal felony whereby he is deprived of his right to vote under Article VI, Section 1, Constitution of Texas, and Article 2954, V. C. S., is ineligible or disqualified to serve as trustee of a common school district by reason of the provisions of Article 2745, Section 1, V. C. S., unless and until he has been restored to full citizenship and right of suffrage, or pardoned.




4


SUMMARY

By virtue of the provisions of Article 2745, Section 1, Article 2954, V. C. S., and Article VI. Section 1, Constitution of Texas, a person who has been convicted of a felony, Federal or State, is ineligible or not qualified to serve as trustee of a common school district unless and until he has been restored to full citizenship and right of suffrage, or pardoned.


Very truly yours,
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
By /s
Chester E. Ollison
Assistant
CEO:WB
APPROVED:

/s
ATTORNEY GENERAL