Skip to main content

Texas Advisory Opinions June 30, 1947: AGO V-290 (June 30, 1947)

Up to Texas Advisory Opinions

Collection: Texas Attorney General Opinions
Docket: AGO V-290
Date: June 30, 1947

Advisory Opinion Text

Texas Attorney General Opinions

1947.

No. V-0290 (1947).




1


June 30, 1947

Honorable Sam Lee,
County Attorney,
Brazoria County,
Angleton, Texas

Opinion No. V-290

Re: The liability of the County to pay the expenses of road bond and local option elections.

Dear Sir:

We refer to your letter requesting an opinion of this Department, and which is substantially as follows:

On the 27th day of February, 1947, the Commissioners' Court ordered an election upon a petition being filed and under the authority of any general or special law enacted pursuant to Section 52, Article III of the Constitution of the State of Texas.

The election was duly held; the bond issue was defeated and the auditor of Brazoria County has been presented with a bill for the expenses of holding this election both as to the payment of election officials and for the payment of election supplies.

Another election was duly ordered by the Commissioners' Court under the provisions of Chapter 16, general laws of the State of Texas, and the court ordered the election to be held and governed, though not by way of limitation, by Articles 752-a, 752-w, 767-b and 767-a, V. C. S. The election was duly held and the bond issue was defeated.

Both of said Road Districts lie wholly within Brazoria County but whose boundaries are not coextensive with those of said county.

The Commissioners' Court has also called




2


an election under the local option election law to determine whether or not the sale of beer shall be legal in Justice of Peace Precinct No. 6 of Brazoria County, Texas.

1. Is the County of Brazoria liable for the payment of the expenses incident to holding the above stated bond elections or any proportion thereof?

2. If the County of Brazoria is not liable for the payment of the costs and expenses of holding the above stated bond elections, then who is liable for the payment of the election expenses?

3. Is the County of Brazoria liable for the payment of the expenses of holding the local option election to determine whether or not the sale of beer in Justice Precinct shall be legal?

4. If the County of Brazoria is not liable for the expenses of holding this local option election to determine the legality of the sale of beer in Precinct No. 6 then who is liable for the payment of these election expenses?

5. Can the Commissioners' Court require the payment of a deposit upon the filing of the petition calling the above stated elections -- both bond elections and local option elections -- from the petitioners as in the water improvement elections under Article 7622B, Section 3, as amended.

6. Would the opinion you have given in answer to the above stated questions have been different if the elections had carried instead of being defeated?

Article 2943, V. C. S., provides as follows:

"Judges and clerks of general and special elections shall be paid Five Dollars ($5.00) a day each, and Fifty Cents (50¢) per hour each for any time in excess of a day's work as herein defined. The judge who delivers the returns of election immediately




3


after the votes have been counted shall be paid Two Dollars ($2.00) for that service; provided, also, he shall make returns of all election supplies not used when he makes return of the election. Ten (10) working hours shall be considered a day within the meaning of this Article. The compensation of judges and clerks of general and special elections shall be paid by the County Treasurer of the county where such services are rendered upon order of the Commissioners. (Emphasis ours)

Article 2996, V. C. S., is as follows:

"All expenses incurred in providing voting booths, stationery, official ballots, wooden or rubber stamps, tally sheets, polling lists, instruction cards, ballot boxes, envelopes, sealing wax and all other supplies required for conducting a general or special election shall be paid for by the county, except the cost of supplying booths for cities. All accounts for supplies furnished or services rendered shall first be approved by the commissioners court, except the accounts for voting booths for cities."

Both elections referred to in your letter are special elections.

It is stated in 9 RULING CASE LAW, p. 978 that "Any election which is not regularly held for the election of officers or for some other purpose which shall come before the electors at regular fixed intervals is a special election.

It is stated in 20 CORPUS JURIS, p. 56 that "A special election is one provided for by law under special circumstances. It is an election held to supply a vacancy in office before the expiration of the full term for which the incumbent was elected, or an election at which some question or proposition is submitted to the vote of the qualified electors, or an election for some particular emergency. ..."

Road Districts are created by an election under authority of the Commissioners' Court and are under the exclusive supervision of the Commissioners' Courts




4


of their respective counties. Article 2943, supra, provides that the compensation of judges and clerks of general and special elections shall be by the County Treasurer of the county where such services are rendered, upon order of the Commissioners' Court of such county, and Article 2996, supra, provides that all expenses in providing voting booths and all other supplies required for conducting a general or special election shall be paid by the county except the cost of supplying booths for cities, upon being approved by county auditors.

In view of the foregoing, it is the opinion of this Department that the county is liable for the payment of the expenses incident to holding the bond elections under the related facts. Articles 2943 and 2996, V. C. S. Inasmuch as Question No. 1 is answered in the affirmative an answer to Question No. 2 is unnecessary.

Article 666-32, Penal Code, authorizes the Commissioners' Court to order a local option election to determine whether or not the sale of liquors shall be prohibited or legalized in its county. Pursuant to this statute the Commissioners' Court of Brazoria County called such an election.

By virtue of the same being a special election, and in view of all the foregoing statutes relative to special elections, it is the further opinion of this Department that Question No. 3 is also answered in the affirmative.

Since Question No. 3 is answered in the affirmative, we shall omit answering Question No. 4.

In the absence of statutory authority providing for payment of a deposit upon the filing of the petition, the Commissioners' Court cannot require such a deposit by the petitioners in bond and local option elections.

By reason of the foregoing, it is the further opinion of this Department that the county is liable for the expenses in the holding of such elections, regardless of the result of the election.




5


SUMMARY

Brazoria County is liable for the expenses incurred in holding bond elections and a local option election within said county regardless of the result of the elections. (Art. 2943 and 2996, V.C.S.) In the absence of authority, the Commissioners' Court may not require a deposit from petitioners upon filing a petition for said elections.


Very truly yours,
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
By /s
Bruce Allen
Assistant
BA:wb:sh:mw
APPROVED:

/s
ATTORNEY GENERAL