Skip to main content

Texas Advisory Opinions June 21, 1971: AGO M-891 (June 21, 1971)

Up to Texas Advisory Opinions

Collection: Texas Attorney General Opinions
Docket: AGO M-891
Date: June 21, 1971

Advisory Opinion Text

Texas Attorney General Opinions

1971.

No. M-0891 (1971).




4343


June 21, 1971

Honorable Hugh Yantis
Executive Director Texas Water Quality Board Austin, Texas 78701

Opinion No. M-891

Re: Power to Contract on behalf of State of Texas for Federal grants or loans under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act.

Dear Mr. Yantis:

You have asked our opinion as to the powers of Texas Water Quality Board and of yourself as Executive Director thereof to contract with the Federal Government. You ask three questions:

1) Based on the Water Quality Fund Program, does the Texas Water Quality Board, acting on behalf of the State of Texas and through its Executive Director, have the authority to certify and agree that the State of Texas will pay 25% of the estimated reasonable costs of all treatment works projects for which Federal grants are to be made under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, the construction contracts on which are let on or after July 1, 1970?

2) Would such a certification and agreement of the Texas Water Quality Board be binding on the State of Texas?

3) Is the Executive Director of this agency, acting on behalf of and pursuant to the directive of the Texas Water Quality Board, authorized to execute such a certification and agreement and bind the State?

With two exceptions, to be hereinafter discussed, all three questions are answered in the affirmative. Your organic law authorizes agreements with the Federal




4344


Government. Section 3.25, Texas Water Quality Act; Article 7621d-1; Section 21.087, Texas Water Code. This law specifically relates to Texas Water Quality Board and provides:

Federal grants

Sec. 3.25. The board may execute agreements with the Department of the Interior, the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration or any other federal agency that administers programs providing federal cooperation, assistance, grants, or loans for research, development, investigation, training, planning, studies, programming, and construction related to methods, procedures, and facilities for the collection, treatment, and disposal of waste or other water quality control activities. The board may accept federal funds for these purposes and for other purposes consistent with the objectives of this Act and may use the funds as prescribed by law or as provided by agreement.

To further assure that Texas Water Quality Board can contract with the United States Government on behalf of the State of Texas, your attention is invited to your further authorizations found in Section 7.12 of House Bill 1440, Acts of the 62nd Leg., Regular Session, effective May 14, 1971. Related authority and support for such contracts by Texas Water Quality Board on behalf of the State of Texas is found in Section 21.095, of House Bill 1412, Acts of the 62nd Leg., Regular Session, effective May 31, 1971; Section 21.095, of the Texas Water Code. This office had already approved the River Authority Compact plan in Opinion M-822, dated March 30, 1971.

In view of the foregoing discussion of the statutory authority of your Board to contract, and after considering the Resolution of Texas Water Quality Board dated May 20, 1971, authorizing you as Executive Director to sign for the Texas Water Quality Board, you can bind the State, subject to two objections to be hereinafter discussed.




4345


Your first question also encompasses whether the Board, or you as Executive Director thereof, may apply to the Environmental Protection Agency to certify waste water treatment works within Texas back to July 1, 1970. Section 8, of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act specifically provides for such a procedure and we find the basic authority of your Board broad enough to contract and certify to the Federal Government such reimbursable projects as your Board find have met or can meet the Federal law.

Likewise, under Section 8(b) (7), Federal Water Pollution Control Act, we find no reasons under the board provisions of Texas law why the percentage limitations on previous grants cannot be increased and related back to July 1, 1970.

One impediment to the contracts you mention is found in Article 9.32 of the Texas Election Code which reads in part as follows:

"Within sixty (60) days from the date of any election upon any proposed amendment to the Constitution, and not thereafter, any citizen of this State who is a qualified voter, should have the right to contest said election by filing his petition in a district court of Travis County, fully stating his grounds for contest,..."

Senate Joint Resolution No. 17, which was adopted by the Texas electorate at an election held on May 18, 1971, added a new Section 49-d-1 to Article III of the Texas Constitution. This is the real basis for the new procedures whether to obtain waste water treatment by issuance of bonds or by direct assistance contracts, and any certification to the United States Government would by law be subject to the said Article 9.32 election contest until after July 18, 1971, (60 days after the election of May 18, 1971).

Any contract with the Federal Government by Texas Water Quality Board must bear the approval of the Governor of Texas. Art. IV, Sec. 10, Texas Constitution. This requirement for the Texas Governor's approval is explained




4346


in Opinion M-312, dated December 10, 1968, which sets forth a proper endorsement for the Governor.

SUMMARY

Texas Water Quality Board through its Executive Director may contract for the State of Texas with the Federal Government for Federal grants or loans available under Section 8 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. This contractual authority is subject to the 60-day limitation contained in Article 9.32 of the Texas Election Code and to the Constitutional requirement that the Governor of Texas approve the Federal Contract.


Yours very truly,

/s
CRAWFORD C. MARTIN
Attorney General of Texas
Prepared by Roger Tyler
Assistant Attorney General
APPROVED:
OPINION COMMITTEE
Kerns Taylor, Chairman
W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman
Scott Garrison
Mike Stork
Pat Bailey
R. D. Green
Bob Flowers
MEADE F. GRIFFIN
Staff Legal Assistant
ALFRED WALKER
Executive Assistant
NOLA WHITE
First Assistant